|
|
|
|
|
Opera Britannia, 16 September
2009 |
Stephen Jay-Taylor |
|
Don Carlo: The Royal Opera, 15th September 2009
|
Photos: Catherine Ashmore |
Following
on from the concert performances of Linda di Chamounix, this Don Carlo
constituted the first staged opera to open the 2009/10 season, and, just as
when the production was new in the summer of last year, there was quite a
high level of expectations attaching to the event, some of them even my own.
I may as well say immediately that this time, just as last, most of these
were summarily dashed well before the middle of Act II, scene ii – the
cloisters of the monastery of San Yuste – in which the truly dreadful, lurid
kiddo-Lego pasteboard set, cardboard cypresses and amateurish direction of
what one would have thought foolproof theatrical encounters rendered the
whole powerful drama on about the level of a poorly mounted school play.
Quite what Nicholas Hytner, the director of the National Theatre, could be
thought to have brought to this staging other than Bob Crowley’s hideous,
unatmospheric, cheap-looking designs, God alone knows – barely acceptable as
a £10 Travelex show in the Olivier, and I’d still want a 50% refund -
because it certainly isn’t any profound engagement with the drama at the
level of individual Personenregie (there isn’t any) much less any sense of
the extraordinary work’s sheer scale and scope. The Royal Opera House itself
in its promotional puffs has variously described the staging as “spacious
and stylized” and most recently (and preposterously) “sumptuous”. This is
the merest spinful thinking. The opening Fontainebleau act is certainly
“stylised” all right: with its already tatty and poorly-laid, ruched-up
floor-cloth representing “snow” – over the front edge of which everybody
tonight tripped at some point or other – which has to be hauled upstage so
as not to stick out under the descending “fourth wall” that acts as an
act-and scene- change cover, and with two white tree trunks conveniently
acting as practicable props to sit on around the miraculously self-lighting
gas bonfire, we’re back in a world of tawdry theatrical illusion that looks
considerably older than the opera itself, and scarcely credible as the work
of a respected theatre director in 2008. The fifty-year old Visconti show
never looked this rubbishy, even after thirty years’ long hard service.
The “sumptuous” staging of the Auto-da-fé is so inept as to beggar belief, a
dinky 1:10 scale model of the mighty façade of Valladolid Cathedral about
fifty feet upstage, some weird Turin shroud-type cylindrical cloth obscuring
most of stage right, and a spavined procession of heretics all of which
gives the impression that at some point Covent Garden has had the bailiffs
in. This will be laughed off the stage at the Metropolitan Opera when the
show – it’s a co-pro, so surely somebody had some money to put into it –
debuts there next year. And if the flabby staging weren’t bad enough – the
choral blocking is heroically dreadful, and the shocking, stand-off climax
between father and son pathetically muffed – Hytner has been allowed to
continue his wretched practice of having a priest noisily harangue all the
heretics by individual name in yelled Latin dialogue (translated on the
surtitle screen, though neither Verdi nor his librettists included any such
material) that is considerably louder than, and obscures, the music. O,
someone needs burning alright….
All of which might have mattered a little less if, as last year, in the
general sea of scenic slovenliness, there was a blinding performance of
Verdi’s score going on. No such luck. To my amazement, the conductor who has
given us such thrilling accounts of Elektra and Lohengrin in the house,
Semyon Bychkov, here gave us easily the most unidiomatic, leaden trudge
through the score I recall hearing across both decades and continents,
killing Eboli’s "Veil song" stone dead, plodding through the Auto-da-fé like
a bored bandmaster, but engaging in sudden little bursts of unwritten
accelerandi when he felt the dramatic temperature was in danger of falling
below zero. Not a climax was properly placed, and the overall dramatic
structure felt flat and interminable, with much artificial highlighting of
detail that fought against Verdi’s carefully calculated jet-black tinta. It
said much for the orchestra’s professionalism that they actually played very
well indeed, and with a deal of both refinement and virtuosity, but I
haven’t personally heard the score go for less in the House since Solti,
more years ago than I care either to admit or even remember. I was also much
put out that, far from expanding upon the overly cautious approach to the
performing text that Pappano permitted himself last year – adding nothing of
the myriad discoveries made in the Paris archives over the past thirty-odd
years save the very welcome “Lacrymosa” duet for father and son in Act IV –
Bychkov even decided to cut that. I want to hear the opening prelude, the
woodcutter’s chorus, the starving peasantry’s plea (dear God, even the
snip-happy Metropolitan perform these) and the two duets for Elisabetta and
Eboli in Act III and IV. The ballet you can keep.
The intention with this revival was to replicate the original cast from
last year with the exception of recasting the eponymous “hero” in the shape
of Jonas Kaufmann. In the event, Sonia Ganassi – the Eboli – withdrew
due to childbearing duties, leaving us with Messrs. Keenlyside and
Furlanetto, and Ms. Poplavskaya as before, and Marianne Cornetti as Eboli.
Keenlyside’s Posa remains dignified, intelligent and sung with scrupulous
musicianship, within an evenly-produced, warmly lyrical line ("Per me
giunto" was exemplary in this respect): but it is hard to escape the feeling
that the voice is at the very least one size too small for the role; and
that smooth, suave and subtle is all very well, but ultimately
underwhelming. Furlanetto’s voice is not perhaps ideally steady – though up
against John Tomlinson’s way-past-bedtime Inquisitor he sounded firmer than
a rock – but the fact is that he alone in this staging has the authentic
Italian manner, rides the orchestra with ease, commands the stage, and now
invests his Act IV aria with much more evident feeling than he managed last
year. Considered as a single piece of singing, his account of "Ella giammai
m’amò!" was in many respects the highlight of the performance.
I thought Marianne Cornetti quite woeful in the "Veil song", though as I
have suggested above, possibly not all the blame for that can be laid at her
door. On the other hand, the spread, blowsy tone is all her own, and would
probably have done for it whatever the accompaniment. Hytner’s staging is
also responsible for the poor woman’s mistaken midnight tryst with Carlo –
who’s expecting Elisabetta – getting the loudest and most widespread round
of upfront guffawing I’ve ever heard at this point from an audience who by
this time clearly regarded the drama as so much pasteboard (like the sets).
Unforgivable to expose the poor woman in this way, and in yet another avenue
of flat cardboard cypresses lit like Blade Runner. Of course, it doesn’t
help that Cornetti is a foot shorter and wider than the woman she’s mistaken
for, but that is what directors are there to help circumnavigate, not treat
as a throwaway joke. In fact, she rallied for "O don fatale", and though it
was neither subtle nor suave – the high C flat went on for what felt like
hours, throbbing like a car on a cold morning, but undeniably there – she
certainly has the grand manner, and rather unexpectedly I found myself
warming to her.
No chance, alas, of warming to Marina Poplavskaya’s utterly miscast
Elisabetta, a chilly impersonation for all the very evident dramatic
commitment, and a voice not remotely suited to Verdi. Treading on eggshells
when trying to sing softly and still retain some semblance of technical
control over the voice – "Non pianger, mia compagna" in Act II – she ran
into real problems with Act V’s "Tu che le vanità", which emerged as a
disconnected series of bumps and jolts, bereft of proper Italian(ate)
legato, with phrasing compromised by endemic short-windedness; and though
she manifests a laudable tendency to try to sing softly, she rapidly swells
to a more controllable fortissimo and then dives into the following note
with what I can only describe as a “yowl” (you hear a lot of it, alas, in
late-period Leontyne Price). That certainly scuppered “Francia!”, which I
have known draw tears when properly sung like a caress against the cheek
rather than the ugly glottal gulp we got here. There are passages in the
voice that still lead me to believe that her future is in Wagner: I
certainly think she should be singing Senta and Elsa right now rather than
this completely unItalianate Elisabetta, steely and lacking in any vocal
warmth or colour.
Which
really only leaves us with Don Carlo himself. If only a great Don Carlo a
great Don Carlo made, then this would have been the greatest since Vickers.
As it is, rather like Don Giovanni, the opera can carry a less than
first-rate protagonist: but a first-rate protagonist cannot carry the opera.
Kaufmann was truly magnificent, beyond expectation in the role, and actually
completely confuted two of my preconceptions: one, that he would sing a
gung-ho performance; and two, that he would sound, as he always has here so
far, strongly baritonal. In the event, the tenor sounded more or less
entirely tenorial all night, with little or no trace of the tremendous black
bark he has at his command. And so far from gung-ho, this was the very
subtlest, exquisitely shaded account of the role I’m prepared to wager it
has ever been given, anywhere. For once I found myself cursing the original
tenor, Morère, against whom Verdi took so violently during the nearly 300 –
that is not a misprint, by the way - rehearsals the piece had in Paris in
1866/67 that he stripped him of his aria at the start of Act V and gave it,
rewritten, to the soprano instead. To hear Kaufmann sing whatever Verdi had
originally planned instead of "Tu che le vanità" I think I’d offer up at
least an arm, and quite possibly both legs.
The truly remarkable thing is that Kaufmann’s barely whispered "Io vengo
a domandar" in Act II and his share of the Act V duet were so completely
audible, though sung on the merest thread of voice, and never once – as
undeniably used to happen with Vickers – lapsing into crooning. To retain so
much characteristic, and properly coloured and supported tone in an
instrument the sheer size of Kaufmann’s, when singing right at the top of
his range but in considerably less than half-voice, is little short of
miraculous, and I was often metaphorically rubbing my ears in disbelief at
the technical prodigy we were experiencing live. I‘ve not heard the like
since Caballé’s legendary days, and never really expected to again, least of
all from a natural heldentenor. Of course, where heft was required, it was
handsomely forthcoming – why doesn’t this man just get on with it and sing
Otello, for which he lacks nothing? – but he is a good colleague and rarely
lets himself go in the ensemble numbers that constitute the bulk of his
part. For him alone, this revival is a pearl beyond price, and indeed
the men are all good (sterling support work from Robert Anthony Gardiner’s
Lerma, too, though Robert Lloyd is in truth now too unsteady for Carlo
Quinto/Mysterious Monk). But most of the rest is alas something of a trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|