|
|
|
|
|
Opera.uk, February 2012 |
Martin Bernheimer |
|
Gounod: Faust, Metropolitan Opera New York, ab 29. November 2011 |
|
Faust, New York
|
|
They keep trying to reinvent the wheel at the METROPOLITAN OPERA. Much fuss
is mustered these days because Peter Gelb dares entrust new productions to
directors from the socalled legitimate theatre and other show-business
realms. Actually, the trend, if it can be called that, began back in 1950
when Rudolf Bing inaugurated his revolutionary regime with a Don Carlos
staged by the Shakespeare expert Margaret Webster. Although some subsequent
excursions proved more successful than others, a notable high point was
reached in 1953 when Peter Brook scrubbed the cobwebs of tradition from
Faust.
Gounod's essentially Gallic, romantically sweetened, naively
superficial yet deliriously pretty revision of Goethe's Germanic tragedy was
later assigned to such outsiders as JeanLouis Barrault (1965) and Harold
Prince (1990). In 2005, the Faustspielhaus in Fun City hosted a rather
cheeky production by Andrei Serban. Gelb apparently disliked it, however,
and withdrew it after only 16 performances. Economy be damned.
On
November 29 Gelb imported the controversial staging created by Des McAnuff
for the ENO. Enlarged and recast at Lincoln Center, it managed to rankle
conservatives and disappoint progressives at the same time. The director,
celebrated for Jersey Boys on Broadway and Shakespeare in Canada, tried
desperately to make Faust relevant-now there's a dirty word-historically,
sociologically and politically. He banished storybook kitsch, kept the stage
dark and stark. He moved the action to the mid 20th century (back and forth
between wars), and superimposed an irrelevant subplot about the invention of
the atom bomb in Los Alamos. Here Faust the philosopher becomes a laboratory
scientist. Robert Brill's basic set, embellished with video imagery, is a
steel grid flanked by dizzying spiral staircases. The narrative,
meticulously planned and neatly executed, emerges tough, grim and
hyper-intellectual. Gounod's opera, unfortunately, is none of these things.
It is just a hum-along love story.
The Met argued sound better than
sight. Jonas Kaufmann enacted the protagonist's plight sensitively, shading
the line with heroic ardour and exquisite finesse, as needed. He sculpted
long pianissimo phrases that took our breath away, if not his. In the
circumstances, one actually expected a diminuendo on the top C of 'Salut,
demeure', a feat managed by such past paragons as Giuseppe Sabbatini, Alain
Vanzo and Giuseppe di Stefano. That turned out to be wishful expecting.
Maybe next time.
Marina Poplavskaya, an early replacement for the
temperamental Angela Gheorghiu (who proclaimed the production `a fiasco' in
a radio interview), played the emphatically modern Marguerite with stoic
pathos. Essentially a daring singing-actress rather than a disciplined vocal
technician, the Russian soprano gave all she had. Sometimes it was enough.
René Pape sang lustily as a jolly, debonair Mephistopheles. He even managed
a nifty soft-shoe routine during his mock-serenade. Still, a bit more
sardonic danger would have been useful. Russell Braun found Valentin's
dramatic outbursts more congenial than his lyrical reflections. Michele
Losier brought gutsy enthusiasm to Siebel's Hosenrolle platitudes, and Wendy
White simpered deftly as Dame Marthe Schwerlein.
Yannick
Nézet-Séguin, the muchapplauded conductor, dared restore some passages often
cut (including the Walpurgisnacht episode, here mimed rather than danced).
He also managed to enforce unusually broad tempos without compromising
sentimental nuances. He gave his singers steady
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|