|
|
|
|
|
Classicalsource, 19 November 2010 |
Alexander Campbell |
|
Ciléa: Adriana Lecouvreur, Royal Opera House, 18 November 2010 |
|
The Royal Opera – Adriana Lecouvreur [Angela
Gheorghiu & Jonas Kaufmann]
|
Francesco Cilea’s “Adriana Lecouvreur” (1902) has taken over one-hundred
years to return in a fully-staged production at The Royal Opera (the
last performances at Covent Garden were in 1906!). On this showing the
work, whilst it could never be classed as one of the jewels of the
repertoire or a neglected masterpiece, has more going for it than
critical commentary would have us believe.
It helped that both
conductor and director have taken the work seriously. Mark Elder’s
refusal to treat it as a sub-Puccini example of Italian verismo is
crucial to the musical success. It is true there are times when the
inspiration and craftsmanship is not always the most striking, but then
come moments of lyric expansiveness, and orchestral originality and
composition, that are so appropriate to the action that one submits to
its charms readily. Yes, some of the themes associated with certain
characters are rather overworked and underdeveloped and run the risk of
being repetitive – particularly the three-note motif associated with the
vindictive Princess de Bouillon and even the more expansive themes by
which we, the audience, identify Adriana and Maurizio. Cilea (1866-1950)
evidently understood his Wagner but was not able or was unwilling to
develop the use of ‘tags’ beyond identity. The one moment of real
interest that struck at this performance was the collision of themes
that identify the two jealous ladies in the Prelude to Act Three.
However, some of the orchestral complexion is strikingly individual, if
fitfully. Elder kept textures quite spare and almost non-romantic and,
ever singer-friendly, gave his principals room to colour and inject
nuance into their big moments. And big moments the four principals all
get!
Angela Gheorghiu is justifiably famous for the beauty of
her voice and the absolute infallibility of her technique. The voice is
not huge, but how much finesse there is to her vocalism, and her
reluctance to sacrifice tonal purity for histrionic effects is evidence
of an intelligent and knowledgeable artist. Her subtle use of dynamics
and elegance of line (elegance is really the word here) held the
audience rapt and extremely attentive. The ‘Poveri fiori’ of the final
act was superbly delivered. The much excerpted ‘Io son l’umile ancella’
was marred only by a noticeable break of line before the final note that
provides the resolution of key. Much of the part lies in the lower part
of the voice and Gheorghiu managed to keep the projection and power in
the low declamatory passages. From a dramatic point of view she managed
to make Adriana more vulnerable and less overtly theatrical than other
divas have, although her lovable nature was less prominent. There was a
nice touch of improvisatory desperation and devil-may-care in the anger
of her declamation from Racine’s “Phaedra” when she publically insults
the Princess; and she managed the switch from spoken-word to song
consummately. Sometimes actresses playing actresses can be overly hammy
– not here. Her extinguishing the candles before allowing the Princess
to emerge from hiding in darkness was deftly acted – it’s a silent
set-piece as strong as Tosca’s at the end of Act Two of that opera after
she has killed Scarpia. It is a role that suits Gheorghiu well, and she
has the physical allure to be convincing.
Jonas Kaufmann
was not as swashbuckling a Maurizio as one might have expected, but he
too sang with generosity of rich tone and subtle use of volume. The
character is a bit of a cad and weak. Kaufmann captured that side well,
largely by dint of not resorting to ‘stand and deliver singing’. ‘La
dolcissima effigie’ was nicely impassioned – but best of all was the
martial ‘Il russo Mèncikoff’, which was superlatively accompanied by
Elder. Alessandro Corbelli came close to stealing the show with
his endearing Michonnet – he caught the absurdity and pathos of the
character to perfection, never becoming simply sentimental – if only his
music was a little more interesting! He does a wonderful line in hangdog
expressions too! Michaela Schuster was a good foil to Gheorghiu as
Princess de Bouillon and made the most of her big moment at the start of
Act Two, ‘Acerba volutta’, especially when she warmed her tone to relish
the ‘big tune’ at “O vagabonda stella d’Oriente”. She bristled nicely in
her Act Three confrontation with Adriana. As her husband Maurizio Muraro
was a strong presence, and Bonaventura Bottone made up for occasional
lack of suppleness in his singing with his dramatic portrayal of the
oleaginous Abbé. Of the acting troupe Janis Kelly’s Madamoiselle
Jouvenot in particular caught attention.
David McVicar’s
production is detailed and really managed to clarify the intricacies of
the rather convoluted plot. The surtitles really helped, too – I had
never realised the Prince was an amateur “pharmacist” and hence provided
the Princess with her source for the poison. Charles Edwards provides a
stunning set, essentially a model theatre modelled on the baroque
theatres still extant in the world (such as the Margrave’s opera-house
in Bayreuth, the reconstructed Cuvielles theatre in Munich’s Residenz,
and the plainer but magical one at Drottningholm). It rotated gradually
during the evening – in Act One we were side-stage, in Act Two the front
apron provided a theatrical setting (with full footlights) for the
garden intrigue, in Act Three we were amongst the Prince’s guests at the
party and by the final act we were again back stage with all the
artificiality of the flats and backcloths removed. Even the heater in
the final act served to emphasise the deceit of the plot and illusion
that is the theatre. In Act Three there was a gleeful relish of old
dramatic techniques in the use of gauzes and an amusing representation
of a baroque masque.
All in all this is a serious re-appraisal
of a work too-often dismissed. It has much going for it, and it will
also be interesting to see how this production revives with other
personalities in the principal roles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|