|
|
|
|
|
The Independent, 12.12.06 |
By Edward Seckerson |
Bizét: Carmen, Royal Opera House, London, 8 December 2006
|
A bloodless tale of love and lust
|
Carmen, Royal Opera House,
London |
|
How appropriate that the diamond manufacturers
De Beers should have been associated with the opening night of the Royal
Opera's 60th anniversary production of Bizet's Carmen. Expensive and
well-buffed might be one way of describing it; cool and collected might be
another.
Mid-19th century Seville (as realised by designer Tanya McCallin) is all
blue skies, terracotta and parasols. A cast of thousands politely promenade,
pretending to be hot but fooling no one; well-drilled street urchins worry
well-drilled soldiers; even the livestock - the obligatory donkey and the
odd chicken - looks well-groomed. And when the cigarette girls eventually
spill, or rather slink, from their factory, smoke wafting romantically
through the open gates, you're thinking: "This isn't a lunch break, this is
a fashion shoot." Sweatshop chic - how this season's working girls are
dressing down.
The point is that if you are looking for even a smidgen of social realism,
you won't find it here. Francesca Zambello's well-choreographed stage
pictures are strictly in the old "look, isn't it pretty?" travelogue mould.
Bags of detail, but all of it - the earthiness, the ethnicity, the sex -
well within operatic comfort zones. If ever a production strove to reaffirm
that Bizet and his librettists knew nothing about Spain, then this is it.
Even Antonio Pappano and his orchestra - for all their vitality, beauty and
sheen - seemed shy of the brashness.
No one, least of all me, would deny Carmen its romantic spin, but at the
heart of the drama lies blood, sweat and tears, and if you cannot at least
suggest that its main protagonists are driven by irresistible passions then,
frankly, you are lost. And lost was how Zambello's principals seemed as they
gamely competed with the grandiose, every-scene-an-eyeful presentation. They
seemed somehow diminished by it.
Carmen herself - Anna Caterina Antonacci - was well-schooled. Vocally, she
worked the nasal French vowels and rasping chest notes to good effect; she
toyed just enough with the vocal lines to make them sound tantalising. But
rebellious, free-spirited, a gypsy? Not a bit of it. It took all of two
seconds to distinguish her from the all-clapping, all-stamping dancers in
Lillas Pastia's tavern. But in every other respect this Carmen did not stand
out from the crowd. She was, if you like, a symptom of the production -
polished, but never dangerous. Plus I missed the sultry mezzo colours in her
voice. That's a risk you take when casting a soprano in the role.
An even bigger risk was the casting of the gifted German tenor Jonas
Kaufmann as Don José. But it was a gamble that paid off big-time. Yes, you
could argue that this elegant singer lacks the vocal heft for the
soul-baring show-downs of Acts III and IV, but in so doing you must also
remember that Don José is a emotional weakling, a lovesick mummy's boy
destroyed by his own misplaced infatuations. Kaufmann conveyed that
absolutely, with phrase upon melting phrase pointing to the soft-centred
romantic beneath the toy soldier's uniform. But there was a core of
strength, too, and in his convincingly low-key reading of the final scene he
was all the more dangerous for being so completely and utterly the little
boy lost. What a talent this young singer is.
There was conspicuous talent, too, in the Frasquita of Elena Xanthoudakis
and the Mercédès of Viktoria Vizin, and a tremulous vulnerability in the
Micaëla of Norah Amsellem. The voice does nothing for me, personally, but
you have to admire the technique that produces such a rush of confidence
through to the top B of her big aria.
So what of the dashing toreador Escamillo, the man most likely to win the
gypsy Carmen's heart? Well, if you are thinking dream casting, think no
further than Ildebrando D'Arcangelo. And yet even he, a bass-baritone,
seemed challenged by the low-lying thrust of his sing-along aria. But he did
arrive on a horse. Need I say more?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|